|
Directory |
| The Format Wars: Does Anyone Really Care? |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 5
BlueRay
When you get past the physical media differences, it's as we indicated before in the HD-DVD section with much of the remaining technical details quite similar. Blueray supports MPEG2, the old standard video codec used in DVD movies as well as the newer MPEG4 derivatives, AVC, VC-1, and h.264. Currently most Blueray content is encoded with the VC-1 implementation of MPEG4 as is the case with HD-DVD. Also, audio codec choices are significantly varied, with support for Linear PCM, DTS HD, Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus, and MPEG Layer 3 audio, again like HD-DVD. Actual playback times at standard definition (480p) resolutions are much higher than HD-DVD due to the greater amount of physical storage space, 23 hours. Likewise for high definition (1080p) you can store up to 9 hours of content. Though BlueRay has no specific support for playing back HD encoded DVD-ROM like HD-DVD does, it does at least mandate backwards compatibility for reading standard DVD's. One area unique to BlueRay is it's inclusion of the Java language for the creation of interactive menu and navigation systems for BD discs and players, a much more elegant solution than merely relying on pre-rendered video sequences, as is the case with HD-DVD and standard DVD. BlueRay relies on AACS or Advanced Access Content System copy protection, the same as HD-DVD. The BlueRay spec though goes one step further with a system known as BD+, which allows for reassigning new sets of encryption keys over time as older ones become known. BlueRay also uses a similar media watermarking system, known as ROM-Mark, for detection of copied media. Things are also more or less identical in BlueRay's implementation of the Image Constraint Token or ICT Flag when it comes to punishing users for not having HDCP compliant displays. Currently most of the studio's releasing BlueRay discs are not widely using the ICT Flag, which would otherwise force down sampling of high definition content to 960x540 on non HDCP compliant displays. At least for now.
Now that we have an idea of most of the technical issues involved, it's time to delve into a little bit of speculation and guesswork when it comes to evaluating the potential "success" of the formats themselves.
|
|||||||